Home News Call of Duty Has Changed, But Is That a Bad Thing?

Call of Duty Has Changed, But Is That a Bad Thing?

by Nicholas Mar 20,2025

Call of Duty: Two Decades of Evolution—A Nostalgic Look at the Franchise

For over two decades, Call of Duty has captivated gamers, evolving from gritty, realistic warfare to the high-octane, slide-canceling chaos we see today. This evolution has, however, created a significant divide within the dedicated community. Long-time fans often yearn for a return to the series' roots—classic maps, straightforward gunplay, and a minimal focus on gimmicks. Conversely, newer players thrive in the fast-paced action, vibrant operator skins, and extensive customization options. Let's delve into this debate: should Call of Duty hit the rewind button, or is the franchise perfectly positioned for the future?

Nostalgia vs. the New Wave

Veteran players often cite Modern Warfare 2 (2009) and Black Ops 2 as the pinnacle of the Call of Duty experience. Skill reigned supreme; there were no extravagant abilities or excessive cosmetics, just the player, their weapon, and meticulously designed maps.

Fast forward to today's Call of Duty, where brightly colored operators in advanced armor bunny-hop across the battlefield with futuristic weaponry. While this level of customization is undeniably popular, and platforms like Eneba offer a wide array of COD skins to enhance your in-game look, it's also a source of contention. For many long-time players, this departure from the series' military shooter origins feels jarring. They crave a return to the gritty, tactical gameplay, not a neon-lit warzone populated by anime skins and laser rifles.

Fast-Paced Chaos: Blessing or Curse?

Screenshot-2025-03-19-at-21.16.52-1024x625.jpg

Modern Call of Duty is relentlessly fast-paced. The skill ceiling has dramatically increased, with movement techniques like slide-canceling, dolphin diving, and instant reloading becoming commonplace. While newer players appreciate the constant excitement, veteran players argue that this prioritizes reaction time over strategic thinking. The core complaint? The experience feels less like war and more like an arcade shooter with a military skin. Tactical gameplay and calculated positioning have been largely replaced by the frantic pace of bunny-hopping around corners with submachine guns.

Customization Overload?

In the past, character customization was simple: choose a soldier, select a camouflage pattern, and deploy. Now, players can assume the roles of celebrities, sci-fi robots, or even superheroes. While this variety is appreciated by some, others feel it dilutes the game's identity. When a military shooter resembles a Fortnite cosplay event, it's understandable why some long-time fans express frustration.

However, customization isn't entirely negative; it keeps the game feeling fresh, allows for self-expression, and, let's be honest, some of these skins are undeniably cool.

Finding a Middle Ground?

So, what's the future of Call of Duty? Should the franchise embrace a full-scale nostalgic reboot, stripping away the flashy extras, or should it continue down the path of high-speed, over-the-top gameplay?

Perhaps the answer lies in a balanced approach. A dedicated "Classic Mode," devoid of extreme movement mechanics and extravagant cosmetics, could appease longtime fans while allowing the main game to maintain its modern appeal. Call of Duty has always thrived by respecting its past while innovating for the future.

Fortunately, there's still hope for old-school fans. Periodically, Call of Duty releases nostalgic content, such as classic map remasters and stripped-down game modes. Whether you prefer the tactical gameplay of the past or the chaotic action of the present, one thing is certain: Call of Duty isn't slowing down anytime soon. And if you're going to embrace the changes, why not do it in style? Platforms like Eneba offer a plethora of operator skins and bundles to help you look your best, regardless of the era you choose to play.